Trinity Associate Professor Talks Contemporary Chinese Culture and '28 Chinese'



Jinli He in her element - COURTESY
  • Courtesy
  • Jinli He in her element
While working on the delightfully tall task of trying to fit the nuances of San Antonio Museum of Art’s brilliant and massive 28 Chinese exhibit into a few pages of print, I had the chance to interview quite a few individuals with important perspectives. But, none were quite as insightful, or valuable in the sense of the larger dialogue that this extraordinary show suggests, as my email exchange with Trinity University Associate Professor of Chinese Language and Literature Jinli He. A Chinese immigrant, educated in Chinese universities with an immense background in the arts and culture, Jinli has been teaching at Trinity University since 2007. In our discussion, featured below in full, we talked about the importance of the 28 Chinese exhibit, the extent to which the exhibit is representative of contemporary Chinese art and culture, and some of the philosophical/social currents that are key to understanding these works in context. Jinli drops some serious knowledge here and provides us with important entry points to understanding the exhibit and checking our own preconcieved notions.

Huang Yongping’s "Well" - COURTESY
  • Courtesy
  • Huang Yongping’s "Well"
Speaking in terms of contemporary Chinese culture, what do you think are the most important themes/statements in the works of 28 Chinese (as a whole or specific to particular pieces)? With that, can you help me place some of the more overtly political pieces within the current Chinese political context?
28 Chinese reflects some features of contemporary Chinese art and culture. I think the main theme could be described as locality and globalization (for example, the works by Xu Zhen and Madein Company can be viewed as a “company type” of art production which is inspired by commercialism and globalization). He Xiangyu’s Cola Project is not only a reflection on global commercialism, but also his unique use of Chinese thinking and art style (especially the antique series). The transforming process of the Cola Project is rather fascinating (from something harmful/useless [the extractions] to something useful and beautiful [landscape painting]). Huang Yongping’s Well can be read as using Western and Chinese mythologies, but has a deconstructive power (viewing this work cannot arouse pleasant or aesthetic feelings in the viewers—reading mythological stories might). Not many pieces that are so overtly political in this exhibition, except He Xiangyu’s The Death of Marat (inspired by the Ai Weiwei tax evasion case, Ai Weiwei wears the suit worn by People’s Representatives during People’s Congress meetings, and lies on the ground facing down—the fate of an idol, a martyr). Wang Xingwei’s Comrade Xiao He has a political theme (about a young female solider of the Communist Party before the year of 1949’s romantic illusion about revolution, but the way he portrays it has an ironic and playful tone—it makes the piece more about his reflection on certain history than criticism of it). Some other works, such as Li Zhanyang’s Rent-Rent Collection Yard-History Observed-Joseph Beuys & Mao Zedong, borrow political themes or political history, but to do conceptual art.

He Xiangyu’s "The Death of Marat" - COURTESY
  • Courtesy
  • He Xiangyu’s "The Death of Marat"
Li Zhanyang’s "Rent-Rent Collection Yard-History Observed-Joseph Beuys & Mao Zedong" - COURTESY
  • Courtesy
  • Li Zhanyang’s "Rent-Rent Collection Yard-History Observed-Joseph Beuys & Mao Zedong"
I think that for many in South Texas, this exhibit is an introduction to contemporary art in China. As such, do you think the scope of the exhibit accurately depicts the artistic milieu of contemporary China?
Contemporary Chinese art is generally recognized as starting from 1976—post-cultural revolution. This fact suggests a political and social perspective to interpret it. The mid-1980s was really the most creative period. Art historians call this Avant-Garde movement “85’ art new waves.” Several artists in this exhibition achieved their reputations from this period. For example, Huang Yongping was famous for his conceptual art and as the leader of the Xiamen Dada Group. He is one of the most famous Chinese conceptual artists. His earlier works were influenced by Dada and Zen Buddhism. Well is one of his recent works, I think he still continues his deconstructive spirit. Ai Weiwei belonged to one of the earliest Avant-Garde art groups, Star Group. Star Group is the first Chinese art group that was exhibited abroad—Star Ten Years Back in 1989 in Hong Kong (before Hong Kong’s return). Zhuang Huan was one of the Avant-Garde artists who chose to live as a vagrant artist. They used to live in Beijing East Village and other poor suburb areas around Beijing in the 1990s. Zhuang Huan was one of the early Beijing East Village artists. The photos you see at this exhibition were the works made during his East Village time. In the 1990s, Zhang Huan moved to New York and several years ago he moved back to Shanghai.

For a long time, the international art market really favored some strongly political pieces, especially the so called “Political Pop” and “Cynical Realism.” One methodology of Political Pop is to use the original method of social realism to reconstruct the history of the revolution of socialism. The use of the revolutionary tradition, and old rhetorical language to retell this tradition and language, will be an irony for the tradition itself. Wang Xingwei’s Comrade Xiao He and Li Songsong’s Comrade your temperature is back to normal could be viewed as following this tradition. Since 1990s, Chinese contemporary art, with help from western institutions, art dealers, curators and collectors, has continued to exhibit in Europe and the U.S. They are titled experimental art (or Avant-Garde art) by critics to show the art world’s representative voice in China. After 2000, more exhibitions have been held inside of China. The earlier exhibitions abroad seemed to emphasize its political goal—rebelling or uncooperative voice against the government—but the collectors and viewers often forgot there have been diverse voices in the contemporary Chinese art world.

Li Songsong’s "Comrade your temperature is back to normal" - COURTESY
  • Courtesy
  • Li Songsong’s "Comrade your temperature is back to normal"
One thing I really like about this exhibition is that it didn’t intend to find ONE voice, it only intended to collect and show good and interesting works made by contemporary Chinese artists. This exhibition includes some very creative young artists’ works, and their works are their deep thinking and unique expression of their Chinese cultural experience and the global context. To me, this makes this exhibition a great one. Furthermore, the old generations such as Ai Weiwei, Huang Yongping, Qiu Zhijie, and Zhu Jinshan also created some excellent new works. This exhibition shows the very creative and healthy environment of contemporary Chinese art.

There seems to be a tension between opposing forces in many of the pieces in 28 Chinese: consumerism vs. communism, ecological preservation vs. progress, the personal vs. the universal, freedom vs. restriction etc. Can you tell me a bit about the generational shifts and fundamental differences in worldview that are embodied in this unique exhibit?
I have to say, most of these themes are the general themes in the contemporary art world. What makes them different might be that they express unique Chinese experiences. The generational shifts and fundamental differences in worldview that are embodied in this unique exhibit are what I mentioned in responding to your previous question, they are more mature in the sense that they don’t seek to have a political brand—or Chinese brand (back to 1990s, anti-socialism was almost the only topic that gained international attention). Works in this exhibition really show the young Chinese generation’s individual views/concerns of living in this global world. That is why I say that the most important theme is locality and globalization—the young generation’s unique Chinese experience of globalization.

In terms of the traditional/foundational currents in Chinese thought (Confucianism, Taoism), do you think these works represent departures or simply new avenues of expressing similar concerns, dichotomies and edicts?
When I say “Chinese experience,” I mean that those works don’t have a strong sense of departure, or a strong sense of emphasizing the cultural heritage. The Chinese way of thinking and its values just naturally show in these works and it’s simply because they are created from a Chinese perspective. For example, Zhu Jinshi’s Boat, not only the material he used, but the aesthetic value of the piece is very Chinese to me. Qiu Zhijie’s I Used to Have 72 Forms borrows from a Chinese folk story (the monkey king). It is really about the Chinese way of viewing life as a constant ceaseless circle of life, both Confucianism and Daoism. It expresses ordinary Chinese peoples’ value of daily experience, but also expresses humans’ appreciation of being one with the natural process. Hu Qingyan’s One Breath-Portrait of the Rubell Family is very Confucian to me—the family spirit is living by qi—living by family values and a sense of togetherness. There are also some beautiful pieces about history, such as Ai Weiwei’s Ton of Tea, its simplistic shape condensed common people (the ignored group)’s contribution to Chinese history and culture. Ai’s Table of Two Legs is also a reflection/reconstruction of history/culture heritage). Qiu Zhijie’s Memorial for Revolutionary Speech combines his thinking on Chinese political/revolutionary history and calligraphy history. Chinese culture, especially the Confucian tradition really values history and learning from history. I think these things are just in their blood. History is always an inspiration.

Zhu Jinshi’s "Boat" - COURTESY
  • Courtesy
  • Zhu Jinshi’s "Boat"
Ai Weiwei’s "Ton of Tea" - COURTESY
  • Courtesy
  • Ai Weiwei’s "Ton of Tea"
What do you think are the biggest misunderstandings of China among Americans? Do you think this exhibit can be useful in combating those misconceptions?
Chinese contemporary art was first “discovered” by the international realm at the semi-closure of the Cold War. Within this perspective, Chinese contemporary art was recognized in the West as a symbol of the existence of the free individual spirit within the structure of collectivism. And the representative art styles of Cynical Realism and Political Pop, and those artists who committed themselves to “expose the suppression of human nature in China’s society,” won commendation from the West. Andrew Solomon’s influential essay, “Their Irony, Humor (and Art) Can Save China,” published in the New York Times Sunday Magazine (1993), made an indelible impact on the view of Chinese contemporary art among a growing Western audience. To Western audiences, such styles of art were taken as the characteristic standard for identifying Chinese culture. But if we focus only on a narrow and distorted picture, this will become a new form of suppression that further harms Chinese art by limiting it to a false and narrow political theme that allows it only an unreal, distorted existence. Actually, the success of Cynical Realism and Political Pop inspired artists to elaborate their “internationally best-selling” style and to add more political ingredients to it. Equally, it encouraged younger Chinese artists to join the ranks of the “dissidents.” The strategy seems to please the other with its otherness.

The world is changing, life is changing, and so is China. When we talk about China, we shouldn’t just think Communism, Cultural Revolution, Tiananmen Square, or Mao, the Red Guard, etc. I hope this exhibition will show to the viewers a normal China and Chinese society. China is a place with a rich and complicated history and it is also a member of our contemporary global village. Chinese artists, just like artists in other cultures and societies, try to use their art to express their dreams and concerns, and to change our world into a better one.

For you, what are some of the biggest highlights of this collection and why?
Some of the young artists are very good, such as He Xiangyu—he really found a new way to express the young generation’s creativity. It is so great to see that we have great young artists and some already established artists, such as Qiu Zhijie, Huang Yongping, and Aiweiwei—they never stop bringing surprise to us—I’m so glad to see that.


Support Local Journalism.
Join the San Antonio Current Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.

Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.

Join the San Antonio Press Club for as little as $5 a month.