| Priests For Life founder Father Frank Pavone speaks at the Tennessee Right to Life Headquarters. |
The facts aren’t encouraging for fundamentalists on either side of the Reformation: California and Oregon defeated a measure that would have required parents of women under 18 to be notified before an abortion was performed; in South Dakota, arguably one of the country’s most conservative states, 56 percent of voters killed a proposed law to ban all abortions except in cases where it was absolutely necessary to save a woman’s life — which, for an anti-choice advocate, is never as valuable as that of the unborn; and Missouri passed a constitutional amendment, vigorously opposed by evangelical Christians as well as the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of St. Louis, protecting stem-cell research.
Pavone and his handful of followers appear to have violated regulations for tax-exempt nonprofits, effectively crossing “the line by publishing a Voter’s Guide which clearly delineated who they thought people should vote for, based on keywords and criteria (such as ‘pro-life’),” according to Frances Kissling, president of Catholics For A Free Choice. Pavone’s rationale, “government is subservient to God and that man-made laws are only legitimate when they adhere to God’s law,” defies the Constitution and makes the Catholic Church guilty by association. The group’s move more than a year ago to Amarillo from Staten Island may in fact be a banishment, considering the church promotes progressive policies overall if sex is removed from the equation. Kissling added that the Catholic Church isn’t “monolithic. Most bishops, including Cardinal Egan in New York, understand that Pavone crosses the line, and try to keep a distance. A few radicals, like `Bishop` Yanta `of the Diocese of Amarillo`, however, want to push these issues regardless of the law and provide cover for Pavone.”
The electoral shift to the left wasn’t across the board, and Texas voters, as a rule, stayed conservative, but pro-choice proponents did see some improvements — six new state representatives and a new state senator support the right to choose. Yvonne Gutierrez, director of communications and public affairs of the Planned Parenthood Trust of San Antonio and South Central Texas, is optimistic that local women will see improvements in reproductive rights. Despite the political leanings of Texas as a whole, Gutierrez feels that San Antonio isn’t as “ideologically conservative as everyone thinks,” and that groups like Priests For Life don’t grasp the realities women face. Because despite the conversion of a free service Southside Planned Parenthood to a full-fee clinic and a diversion of $10 million in funding to Federally Qualified Health Centers for family planning care, San Antonio’s Planned Parenthood patient donations reached $150,000 last year. Proving that the value of Planned Parenthood doesn’t go unnoticed, especially by those utilizing their services (the clinic saw approximately 30,000 patients last year; only 1,400 were for abortion procedures).
Religious conservatives won’t grasp how humans actually deal with sexuality and reproduction anytime soon. The ongoing U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops approved on November 14 a document encouraging married couples to use “natural” contraception based on a woman’s menstrual cycle. As any woman (or any man who’s ever lived with a woman) could tell you, that gamble is more likely to pay off with another mouth to feed than not. Unless they’re willing to do more than pray for the results of that gamble, these celibate, cloistered men of conviction could best serve by sitting in the sun and tending to their personal, heat-induced mirages.
"The original article incorrectly cited five new state representatives support the right to choose; that $10 million in family care dollars were diverted to religious groups; that the Southside Planned Parenthood clinic was closed; and that 10,000 abortion procedures had been performed by San Antonio's Planned Parenthood last year. The corrections have been made above."