“The reason I came on with BAE OASYS was to use the knowledge I had gained from the experiences I had while serving in combat operations to improve gear and make items to save the lives of U.S. troops. This is where I could see me still 'doing my part' for the guys who are in the same situation now that I was in 18 months ago. I feel that by selling this to Pakistan we are doing noting but the exact opposite. We are simply taking the best gear, the best technology on the market to date, and giving to guys that are known to stab us in the back. These are the same people who are killing our guys. I think that one of the most disturbing facts to the whole thing is that we are still going forth with the PAS-13 optic and issuing these outdated sub-par optics to our own U.S. troops when we have better optics we can put in their hands right now but we are willing to sell it to Pakistan. This is very disturbing to me as an American and as a United States Marine.”By May, Meyer resigned from BAE and was looking to join up with military contractor Ausgar Technologies. According to Meyer, who had worked for the company before, the new job was all but a done deal (Ausgar wanted Meyer to join its “RCOS/Keyhole team,” which contracts with the U.S. military to train soldiers on thermal optic equipment used by snipers and teams hunting IEDS). But that was before McCreight spoke to the government contract manager with Ausgar, who then called off the hire. According to the lawsuit, Meyer got this email from Ausgar's hiring manager in June explaining why he wouldn't get the job:
“Dakota, we have recently decided as of last Monday, 23, May to hire (2) additional RCOS/Keyhole team members. I had talked in previous months with the government customer about rehiring you if the opportunity arose. He was onboard back in March and April when we had discussed. Also our AUSGAR training leads both overseas and here in the States were in concurrence with bringing you back if additional positions opened up. After decision was made by RCOS/Keyhole government manager that (2) additional hires were required to support the program, it was requested that we move forward with hiring you. After contact with the government PM, I was told that you would not be a good fit coming back to the program. That was based on discussions via phone that the program manager had with Bobby McCreight from OASYS. Bottom line, it was determined that based on conversations between Mr. Bobby McCreight and Mr. Bob Higginson, the RCOS/Keyhole government PM, that you were not recommended to be placed back on the team due to being mentally unstable and no [sic] performing on OASYS tasks assigned. Details were not provided but RCOS/Keyhole PM was basically told that based on your current work performance and not doing what was assigned as well as your activities in a social setting related to drinking you were not performing as required to support our effort going forward.”
Support Local Journalism.
Join the San Antonio Current Press Club
Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.
Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.
Join the San Antonio Press Club for as little as $5 a month.